New law will enforce
labelling of contents of GMO foods
Linda Ensor
Business Day – South Africa (SA)
17 September 2008
Parliament’s trade and industry committee decided to include
these controversial provisions in the bill yesterday despite strong opposition
by the health and agriculture departments and despite the technical complexity
entailed.
The original version of the bill tabled in Parliament
excluded genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from the goods for which there
would be strict liability for damage but this changed once the committee
decided to go the labelling route.
Currently, labelling is applied on a voluntary basis under
the health department’s health safety laws and is mandatory only in extreme
cases of genetic modification.
Government’s policy is to support the development of GMO
foods and the agriculture department, which administers the GMO Act, was
apparently concerned that the obligation to label would send confusing
messages.
The committee’s decision was welcomed by civil society
organisations involved in biosafety matters as a breakthrough which would keep
SA abreast with best international practice with regards to consumer
protection.
But Business Unity SA was against the inclusion, saying that
GMO labelling was a technical matter which should be managed by the technical
regulator — the agriculture department.
Committee members of all political persuasions felt strongly
that consumers had to be informed so that they could choose whether or not to
consume GMO products.
The new enabling clause introduced into the bill — adopted
by the committee yesterday — reads that “any person who produces, supplies,
imports or packages any prescribed goods must display on or in association with
the packaging of those goods a notice in the prescribed manner and form that
discloses the presence of any genetically modified ingredients or components of
those goods in accordance with applicable regulations”.
These regulations would be those issued by the agriculture
department which would still be responsible for determining thresholds and
technical requirements.
The clause on labelling is less far-reaching than the one
initially proposed by the trade and industry department which had been
withdrawn by the time the bill arrived in Parliament.
businessday.co.za