Cloned-meat
controversy in the spotlight ... again
(MEATPOULTRY.com, September 04, 2008)
by Allison Sebolt
In January 2008, the Food and Drug Administration ruled
products from certain cloned animals are safe to eat. "After reviewing
additional data and the public comments in the intervening year since the
release of our draft documents on cloning, we conclude that meat and milk from
cattle, swine and goat clones are as safe as food we eat every day," said
Stephen F. Sundlof, D.V.M., Ph.D., director of F.D.A.'s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, in
explaining F.D.A.’s final assessment. "Our
additional review strengthens our conclusions on food safety."
The United States Department of Agriculture also said
shortly after F.D.A.’s announcement earlier this year
that it fully supports and agrees with that agency’s final assessment that meat
and milk from cattle, swine and goat clones pose no safety concerns, and these
products are no different than food from traditionally bred animals, said Bruce
Knight, Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs, U.S.D.A.
Despite the fact that a strong and varied body of science
backs the safety of meat from cloned animals, polls have shown the majority of
U.S. consumers are still not comfortable with the notion of eating meat from
cloned livestock, according to the WSJ. Meanwhile, recent media reports claims
that products from the offspring of cloned animals may be trickling into the
food supply, WSJ said.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Tyson Foods Inc. and other companies
have publicly stated earlier that they have banned the use of cloned animals in
food products. However, many other companies haven't made a similar pledge to
avoid using food from the conventionally bred offspring of clones. This may be
because, in part, no one is tracking the offspring, WSJ said.
Since the F.D.A. approval in January,
meatpoultry.com